Scoping Review: Item Analysis Pada Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) dalam Pembelajaran
Abstract
Salah satu komponen penting dari proses belajar mengajar adalah penilaian dan evaluasi. Ini adalah cara untuk mengetahui batas kemampuan, dan perkembangan hasil pembelajaran mahasiswa serta tingkat efektivitas pengajaran dosen. Pertanyaan multiple choice (MCQs) atau pertanyaan pilihan berganda adalah salah satu jenis penilaian dan evaluasi yang sangat populer. Agar ujian tetap sesuai dengan penilaian yang diinginkan, standar yang berlaku untuk pembuatan instrumen MCQ harus dipatuhi. Diharapkan review ini dapat menambah referensi untuk meningkatkan pengetahuan tentang pembuatan instrumen evaluasi MCQ dengan berfokus pada analisis hasil item analisis pada instrumen evaluasi MCQ. Struktur yang digunakan oleh Arksey dan O'Malley terdiri dari lima langkah. Menurut hasil, terdapat tujuh artikel yang diperoleh dari proses pencarian. Terdapat empat tema yang ditemukan dalam hasil analisis. Mereka adalah sebagai berikut: menentukan kualitas bagian soal; elemen yang mempengaruhi tingkat kesulitan soal; menjamin validitas dan kredibilitas bagian soal; dan menggunakan metode analisis untuk menghasilkan distraktor. Dalam pemilihan evaluasi belajar dalam pilihan berganda (MCQ), ketelitian diperlukan dalam pembuatan soal dan opsi jawaban yang menggunakan item analysis.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Applegate, G. M., Sutherland, K. A., Becker, K. A., & Luo, X. (2019). The Effect of Option Homogeneity in Multiple-Choice Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621618770803
Arikunto, S. (2018). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi 3). PT Bumi Aksara.
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Bhattacherjee, S., Mukherjee, A., Bhandari, K., & Rout, A. (2022). Evaluation of multiple-choice questions by item analysis, from an online internal assessment of 6 th semester medical students in a rural medical college, West Bengal. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 47(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_1156_21
Billings, D. M., & Halstead, J. A. (2020). Teaching in Nursing, 6th Edition. Elsevier.
Christian, D. S., Prajapati, A. C., Rana, B. M., & Dave, V. R. (2017). Evaluation of multiple choice questions using item analysis tool: a study from a medical institute of Ahmedabad, Gujarat. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 4(6), 1876. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20172004
Coughlin, P. A., & Featherstone, C. R. (2017). How to Write a High Quality Multiple Choice Question (MCQ): A Guide for Clinicians. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 54(5), 654–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.07.012
D’Sa, J. L., & Visbal-Dionaldo, M. L. (2017). Analysis of Multiple Choice Questions: Item Difficulty, Discrimination Index and Distractor Efficiency. International Journal of Nursing Education, 9(3), 109. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-9357.2017.00079.4
Date, A. P., Borkar, A. S., Badwaik, R. T., Siddiqui, R. A., Shende, T. R., & Dashputra, A. V. (2019). Item analysis as tool to validate multiple choice question bank in pharmacology. International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology, 8(9), 1999. https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20194106
Dolin, J., Black, P., Harlen, W., & Tiberghien, A. (2018). Exploring Relations Between Formative and Summative Assessment (pp. 53–80). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63248-3_3
Elgadal, A. H., & Mariod, A. A. (2021). Item Analysis of Multiple-choice Questions (MCQs): Assessment Tool For Quality Assurance Measures. Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v16i3.9695
Harti, S., Mahapatra, A. K., Gupta, S. K., & Nesari, T. (2021). All India AYUSH post graduate entrance exam 2019 – AYURVEDA MCQ item analysis. Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine, 12(2), 356–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaim.2021.01.013
Hingorjo, M. R., & Jaleel, F. (2012). Analysis of one-best MCQs: the difficulty index, discrimination index and distractor efficiency. JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 62(2), 142–147. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22755376
Kaur, M., Singla, S., & Mahajan, R. (2016). Item analysis of in use multiple choice questions in pharmacology. International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research, 6(3), 170. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-516X.186965
Kiat, J. E., Ong, A. R., & Ganesan, A. (2018). The influence of distractor strength and response order on MCQ responding. Educational Psychology, 38(3), 368–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2017.1349877
Kumar, A. P., Nayak, A., Manjula Shenoy, K., Goyal, S., & Chaitanya. (2023). A novel approach to generate distractors for Multiple Choice Questions. Expert Systems with Applications, 225(April). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120022
Kumar, D., Jaipurkar, R., Shekhar, A., Sikri, G., & Srinivas, V. (2021). Item analysis of multiple choice questions: A quality assurance test for an assessment tool. Medical Journal Armed Forces India, 77, S85–S89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.11.007
Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
Luyben, A., Barger, M., Avery, M., Bharj, K. K., O’Connell, R., Fleming, V., Thompson, J., & Sherratt, D. (2017). Exploring global recognition of quality midwifery education: Vision or fiction? Women and Birth, 30(3), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2017.03.001
Nojomi, M., & Mahmoudi, M. (2022). Assessment of multiple-choice questions by item analysis for medical students’ examinations. Research and Development in Medical Education, 11, 24. https://doi.org/10.34172/rdme.2022.024
Padamjeet, P., Bheem, P., & Sarita, K. (2018). Multiple choice questions role in assessment of competency of knowledge in Anatomy. International Journal of Anatomy and Research, 6(2.1), 5156–5162. https://doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2018.143
Pan, Q., & Jiang, Z. (2022). Examining distractor qualities of pediatrics subject tests from a national assessment. Frontiers in Medicine, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.921719
Quaigrain, K., & Arhin, A. K. (2017). Using reliability and item analysis to evaluate a teacher-developed test in educational measurement and evaluation. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1301013. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1301013
Sandeep Prakash, N., & Dattatraya Hanumantrao, N. (2020). Effect of surprise test and instruction for negative marking on item analysis in Pharmacology. IP International Journal of Comprehensive and Advanced Pharmacology, 5(1), 19–21. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijcaap.2020.005
Schuwirth, L. W. T., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2018). How to Design a Useful Test. In Understanding Medical Education (pp. 275–289). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119373780.ch20
Yudkowsky, R., Park, Y. S., & Downing, S. M. (2020). Assessment in Health Professions Education. Routledge TNF.
Zhang, L., & VanLehn, K. (2021). Evaluation of auto-generated distractors in multiple choice questions from a semantic network. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(6), 1019–1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1619586
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37012/jipmht.v7i1.1671
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Yasinta Dewi Kristianti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Address:
Universitas Mohammad Husni Thamrin
Jl. Raya Pd. Gede No.23-25, RT.2/RW.1, Dukuh, Kec. Kramat jati, Kota Jakarta Timur, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 13550
Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Mohammad Husni Thamrin is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.